week 4 assignment 36

Absolutely no plagiarism, must be original and very thorough. Please make sure everything is followed in the question and the grading rubric. Assigned reading articles are attached. Must include a cover page and reference page. Must include multiple (at least 3) outside academic resources with free links. Sentences should be short but thorough.

Corruption

Instructions:

In a thoughtful, well-written paper, please compare and contrast the different approaches to addressing the problem of corruption globally. Among other things, are they conceptually valid; are they practically viable?

Please be sure to provide adequate references for your arguments as well as concrete examples for clarification. Your paper should be 6 pages, double-spaced, not including references. Please do NOT include an abstract.

Week 4 Assignment

Week 4 Assignment

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Thinking

30.0 pts

Assignment demonstrates excellent use of various critical thinking standards and concepts. These may include proper use of logic, reasoning and the posing of well-considered questions.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content and Development

30.0 pts

Content is very comprehensive and supported by detailed references to lectures and readings. Thoroughly evaluates the impact, creativity, and value of the subject.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Organization and Length

15.0 pts

The organization is clear and easy to follow. The assignment follows the suggested word count.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Sentence Structure, Grammar, Spelling and APA Form and Style

15.0 pts

Sentences are structured correctly. There are no grammatical or spelling errors. There is use of proper APA form and style, where appropriate.

“Order a similar paper and get 20% discount on your first order with us Use the following coupon “GET20”