University of Montana Biotechnology Biorefineries Paper

Question Description

Requirement: Times New Roman, 12 font, single sided and 1 page and a half on the prompt.

Possible areas of exploration in your paper could include: the area you intend to improve, the means of doing so, the importance of doing so, possible hurdles you may encounter, or any other way in which you would like to address and explain your reasoning!

Biotech: Given 3 million dollars, what would you do to improve the world?in regards of the use of biotechnology

Here is a student sample of what the paper should look like!

Include reference

Unformatted Attachment Preview

If I were to be given $3,000,000 to do whatever I willed to do with it I would make my choice with ultimate consideration. From my known ideas, I would consider investing in the kind of science that would attempt to make an understanding of the neuropathways, specific DNA sequences, and other known telling factors in determining a person’s mental health status or state. Much is to be learned yet from the mysteries of the workings of the human mind and acquiring a sizable sum of money, in millions of dollars, has the potential of discovering even the slightest inkling of another linkage that could enable psychiatrists, neurosurgeons, neurologists, the public, patients, and all areas pertaining, to better identify and recognize “tell-tale signs”, or lack thereof, and make more sense out of all branded kinds of mental illness and those that haven’t even been thought to exist. Those suffering from mental illness understand the general and accepted view that a mental illness is and will never be an equal to physical illnesses, even physical illnesses that humans have imperiled themselves to voluntarily. With this in mind, many projects are underway to improve a broad assortment of areas in the field of medicine, constant technologies are invented to better prosthetics, new equipment has been developed to make surgeries possible without a human hand, and even more, tissues and organs are now capable of being grown to be reinstalled into the body of a person in need of it. Work invested into mental health care would improve the limited understanding we have of our brain and its mysteries, enable us to have access to unimaginable amounts of information answering many questions we have had about our brains, and put a stop to the stigma of mental illness that is both undeserved and deeply misunderstood. To go about this, many hoops would have to be jumped. First of all, the question of ethics comes into play, the idea of testing a person’s brain in efforts to make sense of an entity that is so vastly unknown and abstruse to us has the potential to strike fear into the hearts of the religious, conservative, and scientifically ignorant. Secondly, wild leaps would have to be taken scientifically in order to reach this level of understanding. Risks would have to be taken but it would be possible to reach deeper for meaning through studies with those inflicted with mental illness, from conception to old age, analyzing thought patterns, chemical activity in the brain, behavior, although not as heavily, the body’s responses, brain functionality, and overall wellbeing and performance. Double blind studies would have to be undergone, yearly or so testing, and much analyzing of DNA, mutations, family history and predisposition, environmental causation, personal attributes, germline history, and any other influence, miniscule or giant. The understanding we have now of our brains and the types of burdens some carry or others experience just for a short time is not perfect and will never reach perfection, however, much can be done to improve the side effects of every medication that is available to reduce the impacts of a mental illness. There are horror stories of what happens to people on Risperidone or Olanzapine, Steven’s Johnson’s Rash affects countless individuals yearly, massive weight gain is possible for those unlucky enough to be on a drug in a certain family, and the stigma, debatably the worst of the side effects, belabors each of these individuals and could be lessened if the public understands just how and why a person comes to be diagnosed. It would cure the anxiety of many, the bipolar attitudes many people possess towards a person’s mental wellbeing and their control over it, the depression that many believe is voodoo or selfish attention seeking behavior, and it would give a meaning to these illnesses I am speaking of: anxiety, OCD, ADHD, manic depressive disorder, schizophrenia, multiple personality disorder, dementia, and so many others, a meaning that has the power to cure and to save. …
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount