LEG:500 Assignment 1: Facebook Live Killings

Assignment 1: Facebook Live Killings
Due Week 4 and worth 280 points

Read the article Cleveland Shooting Highlight’s Facebook’s Responsibility in Policing Depraved Videos found at: http://www.nbcnews.com/tech/social-media/cleveland-shooting-highlights-facebook-s-responsibility-policing-depraved-videos-n747306

Write a four to five (4-5) page paper in which you:

  1. Discuss whether or not you believe that Facebook has a legal or ethical duty to rescue a crime victim.
  2. Suggest and elaborate on three (3) ways that social media platforms can be more proactive and thorough with their review of the types of content that appear on their sites.
  3. Propose two (2) safeguards that Facebook and other social media platforms should put into place to help prevent acts of violence from being broadcasted.
  4. Conduct some research to determine whether or not Facebook has an Ethics Officer or Oversight Committee. If so, discuss the key functions of these positions. If not, debate on whether or not they should create these roles.
  5. Propose two (2) changes Facebook should adopt to encourage ethical use of their platform.
  6. Use at least two (2) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia is not an acceptable reference and proprietary Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Analyze and apply the concepts of ethical decision making, corporate governance and  corporate social responsibility
  • Use technology and information resources to research issues in law, ethics, and corporate governance.
  • Write clearly and concisely about law, ethics, and corporate governance using proper writing mechanics.

Click here to view the grading rubric. 

 

 

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 280

Assignment 1: Facebook Live Killings

Criteria

Unacceptable 
Below 70% F

Fair 
70-79% C

Proficient 
80-89% B

Exemplary 
90-100% A

1. Discuss whether or not you believe that Facebook has a legal or ethical duty to rescue a crime victim. 
Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely discussed whether or not you believe that Facebook has a legal or ethical duty to rescue a crime victim.

Partially discussed whether or not you believe that Facebook has a legal or ethical duty to rescue a crime victim.

Satisfactorily discussed whether or not you believe that Facebook has a legal or ethical duty to rescue a crime victim.

Thoroughly discussed whether or not you believe that Facebook has a legal or ethical duty to rescue a crime victim.

2. Suggest and elaborate on three (3) ways that social media platforms can be more proactive and thorough with their review of the types of content that appear on their sites..
Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely suggested and elaborated on three (3) ways that social media platforms can be more proactive and thorough with their review of the types of content that appear on their sites.

Partially suggested and elaborated on three (3) ways that social media platforms can be more proactive and thorough with their review of the types of content that appear on their sites.

Satisfactorily suggested and elaborated on three (3) ways that social media platforms can be more proactive and thorough with their review of the types of content that appear on their sites.

Thoroughly suggested and elaborated on three (3) ways that social media platforms can be more proactive and thorough with their review of the types of content that appear on their sites.

3. Propose two (2) safeguards that Facebook and other social media platforms should put into place to help prevent acts of violence from being broadcasted.
Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely proposed two (2) safeguards that Facebook and other social media platforms should put into place to help prevent acts of violence from being broadcasted.

Partially proposed two (2) safeguards that Facebook and other social media platforms should put into place to help prevent acts of violence from being broadcasted.

Satisfactorily proposed two (2) safeguards that Facebook and other social media platforms should put into place to help prevent acts of violence from being broadcasted.

Thoroughly proposed two (2) safeguards that Facebook and other social media platforms should put into place to help prevent acts of violence from being broadcasted.

4. Conduct some research to determine whether or not Facebook has an Ethics Officer or Oversight Committee. If so, discuss the key functions of these positions. If not, debate on whether or not they should create these roles.
Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely determined whether or not Facebook has an Ethics Officer or Oversight Committee. If so, they did not submit or incompletely discussed the key functions of these positions. If not, they did not submit or incompletely debated on whether or not they should create these roles.

Partially determined whether or not Facebook has an Ethics Officer or Oversight Committee. If so, they partially discussed the key functions of these positions. If not, they partially debated on whether or not they should create these roles.

Satisfactorily determined whether or not Facebook has an Ethics Officer or Oversight Committee. If so, they satisfactorily discussed the key functions of these positions. If not, they satisfactorily debated on whether or not they should create these roles.

Thoroughly determined whether or not Facebook has an Ethics Officer or Oversight Committee. If so, they thoroughly discussed the key functions of these positions. If not, they thoroughly debated on whether or not they should create these roles.

5. Propose two (2) changes Facebook should adopt to encourage ethical use of their platform.
Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely proposed two (2) changes Facebook should adopt to encourage ethical use of their platform.

Partially proposed two (2) changes Facebook should adopt to encourage ethical use of their platform.

Satisfactorily proposed two (2) changes Facebook should adopt to encourage ethical use of their platform.

Thoroughly proposed two (2) changes Facebook should adopt to encourage ethical use of their platform.

6. 2 references 
Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements
Weight: 10%

More than 6 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present

 

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

CRJ320 wk3

Preliminary investigations do not necessarily yield enough information to prosecute a criminal case. Despite a thorough preliminary investigation, many cases require a follow – up investigation. Use your textbook, the Internet, and / or Strayer Library to research articles on crime scene investigation. 

Write a three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:

  1. Assemble a set of guidelines on conducting preliminary investigation for a criminal case.
  2. Propose one (1) strategy that criminal investigators should take in order to conduct an efficient follow-up investigation. Provide a rationale to support your response. 
  3. Select two major crimes (e.g. sudden deaths, sex related crimes) and compare and contrast the key differences in reporting the two major crimes that you selected.
  4. Determine the three (3) most important characteristics of an effective criminal investigator and discuss the importance of each characteristic you determined.
  5. Support or critique the argument that the criminal investigation process should maintain the balance regarding freedom of information through media outlets and privacy rights of alleged perpetrators of crime. Provide a rationale to support your response.
  6. Use at least two (2) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar type Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

    • Describe the major components of and responsibilities involved in the investigative process.
    • Recommend improvements to the criminal investigation process in selected areas.
    •  Describe the procedures for the preparation of field notes and the documentation of a crime scene.
    • Use technology and information resources to conduct research in the criminal investigation process.
    • Write clearly and concisely about the criminal investigation process using proper writing mechanics. 

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Click here to view the grading rubric for this assignment.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

In need of Brilliant answers

Write a 1,400- to 2,100-word paper, using definitions, principles, and theories from previous assignments, in which you establish a thesis regarding the control of organized crime.

  • Identify the problems presented and the various relationships established by organized crime.
  • Describe the legal limitations associated with combating organized crime, including a critique of major federal laws and strategies that support this effort.
  • Suggest a realistic solution to control organized crime by discussing and evaluating the effectiveness of organized crime prosecutions.

Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Discussion Questions

Draft a response to each of the bulleted questions below. Each question must have its own response and have a minimum of 75 words.

1.       Do you believe that a minor should be eligible to receive a life sentence? Why or why not?

2.       The goals of punishment in the adult system is Retribution, Rehabilitation, Incapacitation and Deterrence.  Do you believe that these goals apply to the juvenile system or are they different? In what way would they be different?

3.       Do you believe that legalization of marijuana will lower or increase the crime rate?  Why?

4.       Is there a difference between religious and political terrorism such as Al-Qaeda and anti-abortion or environmental groups?  Why or why not?

5.       What is cybercrime? 

6.       How has cybercrime contributed to the overall rise in crime rates over the last 10 years? What recommendations would you make to combat cybercrime and crimes associated with cybercrime and hackers?

7.    How will cybercrime affect the future of the criminal justice system?

 

 

8.    Technology can create law enforcement with new types of criminal and opportunities to commit crimes.  There was not cybercrime before there was an internet, how does new technology impact law enforcement? 

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Any Takers

Write a 1,400- to 1,750-word paper in which you focus on special issues in the criminal justice field.

 

Include answers to the following questions:

 

  • What is the connection between drugs and crime?
    • Are you in favor of decriminalization of any federally controlled substances? Why or why not?
  • What are some of the causes of terrorism?
    • What efforts are being made to combat terrorism in the United States?
  • What is the relationship between crime and technological advancement?
    • What modifications to existing laws may need to occur to address crimes related to advancing technologies?

 

 

*****Response must be consistent with New APA guidelines complete with detailed intro and conclusion, subtitles for each section, in-text citations, as well as reference page.  *****

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Research topic (TOPIC Proposal Only)

 

This is a 2-part assignment involving a research question and proposal development. You will develop your own development proposal based on interests or topical areas highlighted in the course. This must be a maximum of 2 pages (and a minimum of a short paragraph if your concept is well-defined). Your proposal must clearly set forth the question to be examined. The proposal must be submitted on the provided template for instructor approval.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Research Paper – Development Proposal Template

Liberty University Online

 

Criminology

CJUS 340

 

Research Development Proposal Form from Student _______________________________

 

Type Research Hypothesis Here:

 

Example “Shaming persons convicted of petit theft will make them less likely to recidivate.”

 

(Do not write a question like, “Why do people commit crimes?” or “How do serial killers select their victims?”)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Why This Is Important:

 

Example “There is a position held among certain judges that shaming people will deter them from committing future crimes. For example, we might see a person standing on a street corner holding a sign reading ‘I AM A THIEF.’ It is very likely that they were convicted of shoplifting and sentenced to hold the sign for everyone to see. Accordingly, it is believed that by shaming this person publicly they would be less inclined to commit the same crime again. I believe that this theory is supported by empirical literature.”

 

 

 

 

Research Paper – Final Submission Instructions

The Research Paper is an assignment requiring the submission of 2 distinct works: 1) a previously submitted research development proposal (a 1- or 2-page document outlining what you hope to research and how you intend to do it); and 2) the Research Paper (the actual 7–10-page work detailing the your research).

 

Components of the Research Paper:

  • The rationale: why the research is needed and what the general area of current concern is.
  • Existing research: what is already known about the general area of the proposed research.
  • The research Development Proposal.
  • A discussion of information needed for the Development Proposal.

 

Guidelines:

·      Current APA formatting (12 point Times New Roman font, 1-inch margins, double-spaced).

·      Length of 7–10 pages.

·      Page numbers according to current APA guidelines.

·      Third person voice.

·      Must include:

o   Cover page with the proposal title, student name, course name, and instructor name.

o   References/Bibliography Page.

§  These are NOT to be counted in the total number of pages. You must use a minimum of 3 citations from peer-reviewed journals.

·      The electronic file you submit must be named in the following manner: lastname first initial_submission type (i.e. rp1 for research paper). For example: smithj_rp.doc (this would be J. Smith’s Research Paper).

If you need assistance with writing or current APA formatting, use Liberty University’s Online Writing Center.

 

Non-required elements:

  • The methods appropriate to collecting the required information.
  • The sources of information (size and type of sample, etc.).
  • The timescale and sequence of various parts of the research.
  • A statement of what you intend the outcomes to be (reports, discussion papers, contributions to theory, materials, etc.).
  • Description of who will do what and at what cost (if funding is being sought).

 

Submit your Research Paper – Final Submission by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday on Module/Week 7.

 

 

Research Paper – Final Submission Grading Rubric

Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Points Earned

Proficient

Competent

Novice

Deficient

Introduction and Idea Development

33 to 40 points

Clearly focused introduction; idea development is interesting and sophisticated.

24 to 32 points

Significant, but not major, flaws in introduction and/or idea development.

13 to 23 points

Introduction unclear; idea development uneven and simplistic.

0 to 12 points

Introduction incomplete or ineffective; idea development incomplete or ineffective.

 

Use of Supporting Evidence

33 to 40 points

Use of supporting evidence is detailed, accurate, and convincing; perceptive conclusion.

24 to 32 points

Significant, but not major, flaws in use of supporting evidence.

13 to 23 points

Use of supporting evidence uneven; weak conclusion.

0 to 12 points

Use of supporting evidence vague or evidence is missing.

 

Conclusion

25 to 30 points

Conclusion follows logically from research and analysis and is perceptive.

19 to 24 points

Significant, but not major flaws, in conclusion.

13 to 18 points

Conclusion can be traced to research but embodies major flaws.

0 to 12 points

Conclusion is incomplete or missing.

 

Research

33 to 40 points

Sources meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination; knowledge from the course is linked strongly and properly to the source material.

24 to 32 points

Sources meet required criteria and are only adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination; knowledge from the course is linked only adequately to the source material.

13 to 23 points

Sources meet required criteria and are less-than-adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination; knowledge from the course is linked less than adequately to the source material.

0 to 12 points

Source selection and integration of knowledge from the course with source documentation is clearly deficient.

 

Organization

13 to 15 points

Project is clearly organized, well-written, and in proper essay format including an introduction, body, and conclusion. Conforms to project requirements.

10 to 12 points

Small number of significant, but not major, flaws in organization and writing; it is in proper essay format. Paper does not conform to project requirements in a minor way.

7 to 9 points

Major problems in organization and writing; it does not completely follow proper essay format. Paper does not conform to project requirements in a significant way.

0 to 6 points

Project is not well-organized nor well-written and is not in proper essay format. Does not conform to project requirements.

 

Grammar and Style

13 to 15 points

Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few or no minor errors in grammar and spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no unsupported comments.

10 to 12 points

Small number of significant, but not major, errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing.

7 to 9 points

Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; work needed on grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations.

0 to 6 points

Poor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes with clarity.

 

Current APA Format

17 to 20 points

Includes all items required by current APA and includes less than 2 APA style guide mistakes within the paper itself. Citations and reference page are correctly formatted.

13 to 16 points

Omits up to 2 items required by current APA and includes less than 4 APA style guide mistakes within the paper itself. Citations and reference page are correctly formatted with minor mistakes.

9 to 12 points

Omits up to 4 items required by current APA and includes less than 6 APA style guide mistakes within the paper itself. Citations and reference page include numerous mistakes.

0 to 8 points

Omits 5 or more items required by current APA and includes 7 or more APA style guide mistakes within the paper itself. Citations and reference page are incorrectly formatted.

 

Total

/200

Instructor’s Comments:

 

 

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

2 Discussion Board replies to the topic

 

you are required to reply to 2 other classmates’ threads. Each reply must be at least 200 words with at least 1 citation in current APA format. Responding to a classmate’s post requires both the addition of new ideas and analysis. A particular point made by the classmate must be addressed and built upon by your analysis in order to move the conversation forward. Thus, the response post is a rigorous assignment that requires you to build upon posts to develop deeper and more thorough discussion of the ideas introduced in the initial posts. As such, reply posts that merely affirm, restate or unprofessionally quarrel with the previous post(s) and fail to make a valuable, substantive contribution to the discussion will receive appropriate point deductions.

 

Acceptable sources include peer-reviewed journal articles from the Liberty University’s Online Library (ProQuest, ERIC, EBSCO, JSTOR) and other scholarly works to include volumes or books (as well as Scripture).

 

 

Topic: Why do they do it?

For this discussion board, you will take on the role of a policy adviser for the Department of Corrections in your local jurisdiction. At a community meeting, someone asks you to explain the various factors that might explain why sex offenders do the things they do. Your thread must discuss a competing theory from the textbook readings (Psychological, Psychiatric, Social Structure, Social Process, and Social Conflict explanations) by providing an example that community members will relate to and understand. Be sure to support your answer with peer-reviewed journal articles or other scholarly work.

Replies – Major Points

0 to 10 points

Major points are supported by the following:

·      Reading & Study materials;

·      Pertinent examples (conceptual and/or personal);

·      Thoughtful analysis (considering assumptions, analyzing implications, and comparing/contrasting concepts); and

·      Proper integration of scholarly criminal justice sources.

 

Replies – Contribution

0 to 10 points

·      Moves discussion forward, identifies new issues, brings clarity to issues being discussed.

·      Relates key issues to scriptural/biblical principles and experience.

 

Replies – Spelling and Grammar

0 to 20 points

Proper spelling, grammar, and current APA format are used.

 

Replies – Communication

0 to 10 points

·      Required word count (at least 200 words each) for 2 replies is met.

·      Communication follows Student Expectations.

 

Total

/100

 

 

 

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount