STU Personal Philosophy of Nu

iconPersonal Philosophy of Nursing


Goal:

Discuss the tenets of nursing’s metaparadigm. Identify personal philosophy of nursing.

Your paper should include the following:

– Discuss personal philosophy of nursing.
– Articulate changes in personal philosophy over time.
– Discuss factors that impacted change in personal philosophy of nursing.

Submission Instructions:

  • The paper is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.
  • The paper should be formatted per current APA and 3-5 pages in length, excluding the title, abstract and references page. Incorporate a minimum of 3 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
  • Complete and submit the assignment by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.
  • Late work policies, expectations regarding proper citations, acceptable means of responding to peer feedback, and other expectations are at the discretion of the instructor.

null

Grading Rubric


Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

Final Essay/Paper Rubric
Criteria Ratings Points

Identification of Main Issues/Problems

10 points
Distinguished

Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.

8 points
Excellent

Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.

6 points
Fair

Identifies and demonstrate an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.

4 points
Poor

Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.

10 points

Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Problems

10 points
Distinguished

Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

8 points
Excellent

Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.

6 points
Fair

Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

4 points
Poor

Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

10 points

Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding

10 points
Distinguished

Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.

8 points
Excellent

Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

6 points
Fair

Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

4 points
Poor

Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

10 points

Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature

10 points
Distinguished

Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.

8 points
Excellent

Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.

6 points
Fair

Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.

4 points
Poor

Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.

10 points

Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines

10 points
Distinguished

Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.

8 points
Excellent

Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.

6 points
Fair

Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.

4 points
Poor

Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.

10 points

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Posted in Uncategorized

STU Personal Philosophy of Nu

Goal:

Discuss the tenets of nursing’s metaparadigm. Identify personal philosophy of nursing. 

Your paper should include the following:

– Discuss personal philosophy of nursing.
– Articulate changes in personal philosophy over time.
– Discuss factors that impacted change in personal philosophy of nursing.

Submission Instructions:

  • The paper is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.
  • The paper should be formatted per current APA and 3-5 pages in length, excluding the title, abstract and references page. Incorporate a minimum of 3 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
  • Complete and submit the assignment by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.
  • Late work policies, expectations regarding proper citations, acceptable means of responding to peer feedback, and other expectations are at the discretion of the instructor.

null

Grading Rubric 

Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

Final Essay/Paper RubricCriteriaRatingsPoints

Identification of Main Issues/Problems

Distinguished – 10 points
Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.

Excellent – 8 points
Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.

Fair – 6 points
Identifies and demonstrate an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.

Poor – 4 points
Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.

10 points

Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Problems

Distinguished – 10 points
Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

Excellent – 8 points
Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.

Fair – 6 points
Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

Poor – 4 points
Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

10 points

Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding

Distinguished – 10 points
Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.

Excellent – 8 points
Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

Fair – 6 points
Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

Poor – 4 points
Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

10 points

Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature

Distinguished – 10 points
Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.

Excellent – 8 points
Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.

Fair – 6 points
Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.

Poor – 4 points
Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Posted in Uncategorized