ORG 4310 Leadership and group

Please read “If Humble people make the best leaders, why do we fall for charismatic narcissists?” by Margarita Mayo in Harvard Business Review and answer the following 4 questions.

https://hbr.org/2017/04/if-humble-people-make-the-best-leaders-why-do-we-fall-for-charismatic-narcissists

1. How does the article address the importance of leadership assumptions? Be sure to make explicit and meaningful ties to the course content, such as leadership assumptions (Implicit theories, Drath’s knowledge principles, & romance of leadership).

2. What are some implications of these assumptions addressed in the article? Does this fit with your experience?

3. Go back to your definition of leadership and think about your own understanding of leadership as it relates to these theories. For example, what is your prototype (ILT)? Are you high or low on romance of leadership? What knowledge principles of leadership do you usually consider? (2-3 paragraphs)

Assumptions about Leadership

Assumptions about Leadership

Leadership Theory

A) Your leadership assumptions

B) How does this theory challenge you?

Implicit theories of leadership

Romance of leadership

Drath’s knowledge principle

4. Have you been in a situation where different expectations of leadership created a conflict? Are you currently facing any frustrations/issues around expectations of leaders whether it be others’ expectations of your leadership or conversely, your expectations of someone’s leadership? Which assumption(s) is at play – the romance of leadership, Drath’s knowledge principles, and/or ILT?

Submission status

Submission status No attempt
Grading status Not graded
Time remaining Assignment is overdue by: 7 hours 29 mins
Grading criteria
Knowledge of course material
No link to course content

0points

Incorrect use of course content. Material does not appear to be understood.

5points

Limited content; does not address core issues; limited evidence of research or outside reading material; some material does not appear to be well understood

6points

An average understanding, reasonable level of knowledge in evidence; some good use of reference material; shows some understanding;

7points

Strong knowledge and understanding; tight focus on topic; good use of course material; demonstrates good understanding

8points

In-depth knowledge of theory; strong integration of course material; demonstrates strong understanding

9points

In-depth knowledge of theory; very strong integration of course material; demonstrates very strong understanding

10points

Analysis

No evidence of independent thought or critical analysis

0points

Very few insights, examples, or evidence of reflection; Mainly descriptive, limited if any critical analysis;

5points

Some insight; Generally descriptive more than analytical

6points

Good personal insight; some evidence to support discussion; strong sense of good analysis and critique

7points

Very good personal insight; nice themes developed; some evidence to support discussion; good analysis and critique

8points

Excellent personal insights; strong themes present; lots of evidence to support discussion; thoughtful and critical

9points

Excellent personal insights; very strong themes present; lots of evidence to support discussion; thoughtful and critical

10points

Completeness

Missing 2 or more points/questions

0points

Missing 50-75% of the questions

1points

Missing 1 major or 2 minor components

2points

Missing 1 question or component

3points

Mostly complete. Missing minor sub-component

4points

Thorough and complete

5points

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Posted in Uncategorized