Mens rea, or the mental state of a crime, must concur with the actus reus to complete the crime. This week in the readings we spent a great deal of time examining the various mental states. A. Questio

Mens rea, or the mental state of a crime, must concur with the actus reus to complete the crime. This week in the readings we spent a great deal of time examining the various mental states.

A. Questions about a case: 1. In the context of defining culpability or blameworthiness when crafting a punishment, present a reasoned argument for or against charging someone who has HIV with a crime for infecting another persons with the disease. 2. State v. Stark: You may include discussion of the various mental states and use State v. Stark, 832 P.2d 109 (Wash.App. 1992) Click link to: Stark which can be found in the textbook. 3. Examples: In your analysis you may bring in additional similar cases (from the last five years), and analysis under the various mental states of whether a crime is or is not proper.  

B. Mens Rea: Why do mental states matter in this modern world?  If you kill someone, or rape them or bludgeon them in a fight, doesn’t the end result remain the same?  Try to find a case or an article that shows how we treat different fact patterns and the mens rea in each according to the blameworthiness of the defendant, if you dare…

Place this order or similar order and get 20% discount. USE Discount code “GET20”