I have two questions :
Provide a definition of judicial activism and judicial restraint. What is the appropriate role of judges with regard to these concepts? Should judges use the current sociopolitical milieu as a gauge to interpret the constitution? Why?
and the second one is
How does the constitution define the role of the judiciary? Is it a vaguely defined or clearly defined role? Why do you think that the Framers made the decisions they did regarding article three? Explain.