There are 4 different readings of four different authors: Soroush, An-Naim, Akram, and Hallaq
Soroush and An-Naim embrace Western morals and argue that it works perfectly with Islamic principles in the modern world
Akram and Hallaq are quite the opposite and argue that Western morals would not work with Islamic values
Which one of these arguments makes sense?
4 page, double spaced, 12 size font, Times New Roman
Start with an introductory essay with a thesis statement
The text by Hallaq is not attached. It is a book called The Impossible State: Islam, Politics, and Modernity’s Moral Predicament by Wael B. Hallaq. It can be found as a pdf, if not there is a website called Scribd that has the ebook, or you can find it as an ebook somewhere else.