Critical Thinking Exercise

I don’t know how to handle this Law question and need guidance.


Review the actual case of Experience Hendrix L.L.C. v. Ltd., 762 F.3d 829 (9th Cir. 2014)

The trial court issued a summary judgment in the plaintiff’s favor. A summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact. After reading the case, you will respond with answers to the following questions using your critical thinking and moral reasoning skills:

  • Compare and contrast a material fact and a non-material fact.
  • Identify what indicates that a dispute over a material fact is genuine.
  • Explain an injunction and provide a made-up example.
  • Describe what the plaintiff, in this case, hoped to gain by seeking an injunction?
  • What was the connection between Experience Hendrix’s revenue and Pitsicallis’s conduct?

Get 20% discount on your first order with us. Use code: GET20