Contemporary Ethical Dilemmas

The purpose of the short essays is to allow you to explore the moral theories you have studied with respect to a contemporary moral dilemma that interests you.

What you will learn in these writing assignments:

  • How to analyze and write about contemporary ethical dilemmas
  • How to apply moral theories to contemporary ethical dilemmas
  • How to find solutions to contemporary ethical dilemmas by discovering common ground.

Short Essay Two is due by the end of academic week eight on Tuesday at 11:30PM ET.

Technical Requirements

Short Essay Two is required to be:

  • 800 to 1,200 words (4-5 pages)
  • 12 pt. Times New Roman font, double spaced, 1” right and left margins
  • Microsoft .docx format (not .pages or .pdf)

Directions

[STEP ONE] Short Essay Two will focus on the moral theories you learned in weeks 5 through 7. You can choose one or more of these theories to focus on in your paper.

  • Feminist Ethics of Care
  • Kantian Deontology
  • The Ethics of Virtue

[STEP TWO] For each Short Essay, choose one(1) Applied Ethics subject and dilemma to write about from the list of Short Essay Applied Ethics Subjects:

DILEMMA:

Examples:

For your Short Essay Two paper you could choose to argue using the Ethics of Virtue that it is ethical to take a knee during sports events.

[STEP THREE] Your essay will be organized according to a modified Rogerian Argument Structure:

The Rogerian Argument Structure is used to find common ground between two sides in a complex issue so it is a good writing structure for analyzing and arguing ethical dilemmas. We will modify this structure somewhat to allow for the examination of an ethical dilemma. Your essay will be divided into four sections, with each section answering particular questions about the ethical dilemma and moral theories you have chosen to use. Remember, your essay will be 800-1200 words total so please allocate enough words for each section!

Suggested Title: The Ethics of [case or dilemma] in [subject] using [moral theory] by [your name]

Examples:

“The Ethics of Vaccine Rationing in Medicine Using Utilitarianism by Susan Kitteridge”

or

“The Ethics of Taking A Knee in Sports Using Virtue Theory by John Meyerson”

or

“The Ethics of Manufacturing Defects in Business Using Kantian Ethics by Stephen Mousse”

Each section of your essay must address the following questions:

SECTION I: Explain the ethical dilemma presented in the case in your own words. What are the relevant facts that need to be understood in order to come to an ethical decision? What are the summary pros and cons of both sides? Why is there disagreement between opposing views?

SECTION II: Explain in detail an opposing or different ethical view. What do people who follow this view believe? Why? What are the facts that would lead them to believe this view? Why is this view reasonable for some people to hold? How does the moral theory or theories I chose to study help to explain this opposing view? (Beware the Strawman Fallacy in this section)

SECTION III: Explain my ethical view. What are the facts that lead me to believe in this view? How does the moral theory or theories I chose to study help to understand my ethical view? How does the moral theory help to understand why differing views are wrong?

SECTION IV: What agreement (common ground) exists between my ethical view and the view of people who oppose or differ from my view? How does this common ground help to understand the ethical dilemma? How can this common ground lead to a solution of the dilemma?

Additional explanation of the Rogerian Argument Structure can be found at the website of the Excelsior Online Writing Lab, including a visual representaion. (But remember, we have modified this basic structure above)

Study the example Rogerian Argument Essay (and its embedded comments) for how to structure your own essay.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Posted in Uncategorized

Contemporary Ethical Dilemmas

Question
Week One Assignment

Reading Assignment:

Chapter 1 Introduction to Ethics
Chapter 2 – Contemporary Ethical Dilemmas
Chapter 3 – Health Care Ethics Committee
Chapter 4 – End of Life Dilemmas
Assignment Questions for Week One:

Physician Changed “His” Mind – Eye Surgery?
Nonmaleficence

Ethical principle that requires caregivers to avoid causing patients harm
Medical ethics require health care providers to, “first,” do no harm
In re Conroy, 464 A.2d 303, 314 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1983), “the physician’s primary obligation is . . . First do no harm.”).
Helping patients die violates physician’s duty to save lives
Distinction between killing patients & allowing them to die
Discuss the ethical principles as applied to health care and listed above

Each State has its own court system that is very distinct from the Federal Court system. State courts deal with health care cases on a daily basis. If youhave never heard an argument before a court before, below is a link to the case of Michael T. Vandall, M.D., Plaintiff and Appellant v. Trinity Hospitals, a corporation, and Margaret C. Nordell, M.D., which was heard by the North Dakota Supreme Court 12/11/2003. This case involved a doctor making a claim for retaliatory discharge against a hospital and the decision can be read at Vandall v. Trinity. http://www.court.state.nd.us/_court/opinions/20030255.htm

Give a summary of what you have read here.

What did you find most interesting?

Emergency Care

Two patients in emergency department in critical condition, who gets treated first:

First patient who walks through the door
Younger patient
Patient likely to survive
Patient who can pay for services rendered
Patient with the more serious medical condition


Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount